Suppose you get a call from your sister who is attending college in California. You get the shocking news that she has been arrested and is now sitting somewhere in the jail. No wonder, she is frustrated and needs to get out of the jail as soon as possible. She is relying on your help since your parents have refused to help her. She wants you to co-sign the bail bond with her but you live in Chicago. Now the next big questions is – are you be able to co-sign the bail bond since you live in a different state? The answer is yes.
Situations like these can arise anytime anywhere. Co-signing a bail bond can be done over the phone but there are certain facts you must know before you co-sign a bail bond agreement. Many times you have to pledge your tangible property such as car, home or cash to ensure that the bail bondsman gets the money back if the defendant flees or violates any norms.
A co-signer must know these important points before co-signing a bail bond:
- Co-signing the bail bond will set the accused free from jail.
- Co-signers have to make sure that the accused shows up at all the hearings and meet all the requirements of the bond.
- Co-signer can request the agreement details before co-signing the bail bond.
- A co-signer can ask the bail bond company to cancel the bond if he/she is not comfortable with the actions of the accused.
- To co-sign a bail bond, you must be a citizen of the U.S. and should have lived in the same area for a predetermined period. Apart from these, one should have a stable employment record and a good credit score.
Also Read: Responsibilities of an Indemnitor While Signing a Bail Bond
If you need a bail bond or have any questions about co-signing a bail bond, call us at (714) 240-2245. We can help you get a bail bond sooner than you think.
Juveniles prone to committing crimes have a complicated status within the ambit of the legal system. Being children who lack a clear understanding of the laws, they need special protections. At the same time, they don’t have the same constitutional rights as adults within the purview of law. Therefore, the juvenile courts’ procedures are geared towards balancing these two concerns and rehabilitating juveniles who turn delinquent.
Definition of a Juvenile
A majority of states consider a juvenile as a person aged between ten and eighteen, but some states have set the maximum age limit as sixteen, for such a consideration. Any person falling over a state’s stated age limit is treated and tried as an adult. Also, in some cases, juveniles who are relatively older and commit serious crimes undergo trial as an adult, even though they would be considered a juvenile under normal circumstances.
The terms used by courts for juvenile offenders differ from those used for adult offenders. Juveniles, in legal parlance, are said to be committing “delinquent acts” rather than crimes; they undergo “adjudication hearings”, instead of trials.
Rights and Protections for Juveniles
Juveniles do not have the same constitutional rights as the adults in the American legal system. To quote an example, the adjudication hearings for juveniles are heard by the judges themselves as the former does not legally have the right to be tried by a jury of their peers. They also do not have the right for a bail or trial publically. However, they do have extra protections in the juvenile court system, an important one being that their records are sealed and they can avoid the adverse fallout from their juvenile offenses for the remainder of their lives. When they turn 18, their case records are expunged provided they have met the prescribed conditions at the time of hearing. The other legal rights that they enjoy include notices of delinquent acts prior to their adjudication hearing and getting a prerelease of their delinquent acts was not violent in nature. They can also engage an attorney and a public defender, as it’s likely that they won’t be able to afford one by themselves.
Intent and Purpose in Juvenile Court Rulings
After the adjudication of a case, the judge, during the disposition, has to follow certain guidelines while sentencing the juvenile, if held guilty: their intent and purpose should be act in the best interest of the child and focus on their rehabilitation so that they can move on to lead a productive life after attaining adulthood.
Also Read: How to Post a Bail in Federal Court
Based on a recent article in the Los Angeles Times, there are several reasons for the fact that Law School graduates are facing difficulty in being employed as full time attorneys. The following list will explain those reasons.
- The use of computers has lessened the need for lawyers, with respect to legal research. It has become easier, and quicker, for legal research to be done using the internet.
- Many corporations are doing legal research in house, by using online services. These online services have greatly reduced the need to access law libraries.
- Software has speeded up the information recovery process, especially with regard to discovery.
- There are many companies who use their websites to offer online legal documents. These companies also provide help in filling these documents out. They are much less expensive than hiring an actual attorney.
Based on the LA Times article, it seems fairly obvious that this is an issue involving technology. Technology tends to create new forms of employment, even as it renders other older forms of employment somewhat obsolete.
However, there are other answers to this question. One fairly simple answer is that, at this time in our history, it is common for most people to experience difficulty in finding employment. We have been, and still are, experiencing a serious economic contraction. Jobs of all kinds have become scarcer.
Another factor to consider is the current hiring freeze within the Federal Government. Federal agencies have long been the platform for newly minted attorneys to learn the craft of being a good lawyer. It becomes very difficult for new graduates to learn the needed skills as attorneys without the benefit of entry level Federal jobs. The same hiring freezes are also impacting legal hiring at the state and county level.
A false arrest occurs when somebody is held without legal authority. A bail bonds agent will be responsible for somebody that they bail out of jail until they are due for their court appearance. They are legally allowed to apprehend a defendant that they are responsible for, providing they meet certain criteria. Otherwise it will be considered a false arrest.
Terms of Apprehension
The California Penal Code states that the bail agent should always have a copy of the bail paperwork when they are tracking down their defendant. If they don’t have this paperwork, then the defendant is legally allowed to walk free, and the bail agent holding them could receive penalties and criminal charges.
The authority who released the defendant must have a certified copy of the bail bonds agreement. The name of the defendant must be clearly stated and the document must be endorsed by the bail bond agent. The name of the authority must also be listed.
Rules and Regulations
It’s the job of the bail agent to understand their right to arrest defendants. Some bail agents will abuse this power and will apprehend people without the legal authority. This can lead to criminal charges as defendants will have the right to take matters further and challenge them in court.
If you are out on bail and a bail bond agent tries to apprehend you without presenting the information that’s required, then they will have no right to arrest you. If you are in need of a bail agent, then it’s important that you choose an establishment who knows the laws properly and will ensure that they strictly abide by the rules. In order to do this you must check to make sure that the bail bonds agents have the relevant licences and experience.